dc.contributor.author | Ahmadizenouz, G | |
dc.contributor.author | Esmaeili, B | |
dc.contributor.author | Taghvaei, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Jamali, Z | |
dc.contributor.author | Jafari, T | |
dc.contributor.author | Amiri Daneshvar, F | |
dc.contributor.author | Khafri, S | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-08-26T05:38:27Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-08-26T05:38:27Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.identifier | 10.15171/joddd.2016.002 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/40050 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background. Repairing aged composite resin is a challenging process. Many surface treatment options have been proposed to this end. This study evaluated the effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) of nano-filled composite resin repairs. Methods. Seventy-five cylindrical specimens of a Filtek Z350XT composite resin were fabricated and stored in 37آ°C distilled water for 24 hours. After thermocycling, the specimens were divided into 5 groups according to the following surface treatments: no treatment (group 1); air abrasion with 50-?m aluminum oxide particles (group 2); irradiation with Er:YAG laser beams (group 3); roughening with coarse-grit diamond bur + 35% phosphoric acid (group 4); and etching with 9% hydrofluoric acid for 120 s (group 5). Another group of Filtek Z350XT composite resin samples (4أ—6 mm) was fabricated for the measurement of cohesive strength (group 6). A silane coupling agent and an adhesive system were applied after each surface treatment. The specimens were restored with the same composite resin and thermocycled again. A shearing force was applied to the interface in a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey tests (P < 0.05). Results. One-way ANOVA indicated significant differences between the groups (P < 0.05). SBS of controls was significantly lower than the other groups; differences between groups 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 were not significant. Surface treatment with diamond bur + 35% phosphoric acid resulted in the highest bond strength. Conclusion. All the surface treatments used in this study improved the shear bond strength of nanofilled composite resin used. | |
dc.language.iso | English | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects | |
dc.title | Effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of nanofilled composite repairs. | |
dc.type | article | |
dc.citation.volume | 10 | |
dc.citation.issue | 1 | |
dc.citation.spage | 9 | |
dc.citation.epage | 16 | |
dc.citation.index | Pubmed | |
dc.identifier.DOI | https://doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2016.002 | |