Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJamshidi, A
dc.contributor.authorGharibdoost, F
dc.contributor.authorVojdanian, M
dc.contributor.authorSoroosh, SG
dc.contributor.authorSoroush, M
dc.contributor.authorAhmadzadeh, A
dc.contributor.authorNazarinia, MA
dc.contributor.authorMousavi, M
dc.contributor.authorKarimzadeh, H
dc.contributor.authorShakibi, MR
dc.contributor.authorRezaieyazdi, Z
dc.contributor.authorSahebari, M
dc.contributor.authorHajiabbasi, A
dc.contributor.authorEbrahimi, AA
dc.contributor.authorMahjourian, N
dc.contributor.authorRashti, AM
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-26T04:58:07Z
dc.date.available2018-08-26T04:58:07Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/38709
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to compare efficacy and safety of test-adalimumab (CinnoRA®, CinnaGen, Iran) to the innovator product (Humira®, AbbVie, USA) in adult patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).In this randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, non-inferiority trial, a total of 136 patients with active RA were randomized to receive 40آ mg subcutaneous injections of either CinnoRA® or Humira® every other week, while receiving methotrexate (15آ mg/week), folic acid (1آ mg/day), and prednisolone (7.5آ mg/day) over a period of 24آ weeks. Physical examinations, vital sign evaluations, and laboratory tests were conducted in patients at baseline and at 12-week and 24-week visits. The primary endpoint in this study was the proportion of patients achieving moderate and good disease activity score in 28 joints-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR)-based European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response. The secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for 20% (ACR20), 50% (ACR50), and 70% (ACR70) responses along with the disability index of health assessment questionnaire (HAQ), and safety.Patients who were randomized to CinnoRA® or Humira® arms had comparable demographic information, laboratory results, and disease characteristics at baseline. The proportion of patients achieving good and moderate EULAR responses in the CinnoRA® group was non-inferior to the Humira® group at 12 and 24آ weeks based on both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) populations (all p values >0.05). No significant difference was noted in the proportion of patients attaining ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 responses in the CinnoRA® and Humira® groups (all p values >0.05). Further, the difference in HAQ scores and safety outcome measures between treatment arms was not statistically significant.CinnoRA® was shown to be non-inferior to Humira® in terms of efficacy at week 24 with a comparable safety profile to the reference product.IRCT.ir, IRCT2015030321315N1 . Registered on 5 April 2015.
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofArthritis research & therapy
dc.subjectAdalimumab
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAntirheumatic Agents
dc.subjectArthritis, Rheumatoid
dc.subjectBiosimilar Pharmaceuticals
dc.subjectDouble-Blind Method
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.titleA phase III, randomized, two-armed, double-blind, parallel, active controlled, and non-inferiority clinical trial to compare efficacy and safety of biosimilar adalimumab (CinnoRA®) to the reference product (Humira®) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis.
dc.typearticle
dc.citation.volume19
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.spage168
dc.citation.indexPubmed
dc.identifier.DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-017-1371-4


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record