Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSaleh Saber, F
dc.contributor.authorAbolfazli, N
dc.contributor.authorJannatii Ataei, S
dc.contributor.authorTaghizade Motlagh, M
dc.contributor.authorGharekhani, V
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-26T04:57:57Z
dc.date.available2018-08-26T04:57:57Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.tbzmed.ac.ir:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/38689
dc.description.abstractBackground. Since the misfit of crown has an important role in clinical performance of implant-supported prostheses, and due to the impact of the settling effect on misfit, the aim of this study was to investigate the impact of torque forces on the total lengths of narrow and short implant abutments in different internal implant?abutment connections. Methods. In four different implant?abutment connections, 8 analog implants with a normal diameter (4 mm) and narrow abutment (4.5 mm) were selected from groups of internal hex, internal octagon, morse hex 6آ° and morse hex 11آ°. Each of them was mounted within plaster type IV, and 32 samples were obtained. Then, the amount of vertical displacement was measured by closing the impression copings and applying torques of 20 25 and 30 Ncm. This stage was repeated for the abutment. In the next stage, the resin pattern was built and measurements were performed after applying the torques mentioned. Finally, after making the frame, this stage was repeated, and the settling effect was statistically analyzed with ANOVA. Results. In the stages of impression coping, resin pattern and final prosthesis, HEXAGONE had significantly the highest and OCTAGONE had the lowest rates of settling, and the settling of morse hex 11آ° and 6آ° was between them. Conclusion. Octagon implant had significantly the lowest settling in various clinical and laboratory stages by applying different torques.
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects
dc.titleThe effect of repeated torque tightening on total lengths of implant abutments in different internal implant?abutment connections.
dc.typearticle
dc.citation.volume11
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.spage110
dc.citation.epage116
dc.citation.indexPubmed
dc.identifier.DOIhttps://doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2017.020


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record