نمایش پرونده ساده آیتم

dc.contributor.advisorSaeed Rahimi
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-13T08:18:16Z
dc.date.available2018-07-13T08:18:16Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/16730
dc.description.abstractIntraorifice plug in root filled teeth is one of the most effectiven methods for prevention of coronal microleakage. The purpose of this study was to compare the coronal microleakage of three materials (GlassEionomer, ProRoot MTA and Resilon) as intraorifice plug in root filled teeth. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study , 70 single-rooted teeth with Type I canal system were used. Crowns were removed; then cleaning and shapping (step-back to) was done and canals were obturated with gutta-percha and AH26 sealer. Teeth were randomly divided into three experimental groups (n=20) and two negative and positive control groups (n=5). After placing the intraorfice plugs samples were submerged in Indiaink for 72 hours. These samples were longitudinally sectioned and were observed and penetration was measured under a stereomicroscope at *16. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistical methods and one-way ANOVA using SPSS/13 statistical software. Results: The mean penetration of Glass-ionomer, ProRoot MTA and Resilon was 0.69, 0.73 and 1.1, respectively. Resilon had statistically significant difference with MTA and Glass- ionomer(P0.05). Conclusions : Glass- ionomer and MTA are more effective than Resilon in preventation of coronal microleakage when used as intraorifice plug.
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.titleAn in vitro comparison of coronal microleakage of three materials as intraorifice plug in root filled teeth
dc.contributor.supervisorMohammad Frogh Reyhani
dc.identifier.docno501747
dc.identifier.callno1179
dc.contributor.collegedentistry
dc.description.degreeDDS


فایلهای درون آیتم

فایلهاسایزفرمتنمایش

هیچ فایل مرتبطی وجود ندارد

این آیتم در مجموعه های زیر مشاهده می شود

نمایش پرونده ساده آیتم